On the indignity of cycling clothes


It's okay to laugh. He expects it.
Having your loving wife laugh at you when you put on your clothes is one of the special joys of being a road cyclist. There is something about them that can be off-putting to people outside the sport. It could be the skin tight fabric. It could be the pad used to protect cyclists’ bottoms called the chamois (pronounced “shammy”) that looks like a slightly loaded diaper. Or it could be the general size mismatch between cyclists’ legs (generally largish) and their upper bodies (generally twig-like).

 

The end result is a caricature of a human, a cartoon rendering of an athlete. It’s an end-of-childhood moment when you realize that donning spandex does not make you appear like the super heroes from Saturday morning cartoons of old. With this loss of innocence ringing in your ears, I would like to take a moment to tell you about bicycle shorts.


Bib shorts and dignity are mutually exclusive
Bicycle shorts are skin tight to avoid bunching and chaffing. In general, most people are opposed to bunching and chafing. The opposition to them increases the closer to your nethers they occur. Since bicycle shorts cover the entirety of our nethers (and if they do not, you are not wearing them properly), the tightness is welcome despite its visual side effects.

 

The chamois, that little pad inside the bicycle shorts, is also functional. It is not a diaper and one should avoid trying to use it as a diaper. Because that’s gross. It serves the very special function of padding your bottom during long rides. It would be easy to assume that more padding on the seat would solve this problem, which it does, but it causes a larger one. Thick seats squish padding into places that don’t like having things squished into them. After hours on the bike, there can be nerve related side effects that are… distressing. I find, having written “distressing,” that the word does not capture the scope of terror and horror that one feels when experiencing nerve related side effects in unnamed places. This is a family blog so I will not go into further detail.

If you can see the chamois, your shorts are on inside out
There are two main styles of bicycle shorts: bib shorts and just-plain-shorts. The latter are exactly what you’d expect. They are essentially yoga pants turned into shorts (yoga shorts should be a thing) with a mini-diaper sewn in. To make sure they don’t slide down, they are fitted with an elastic waistband engineered to be just below the threshold where they would cut your torso from your legs. This provides most people with an elegant and delightful muffin top.

 

The former, bib shorts, are similar but rather than an elastic band around the waist, the bib shorts have straps that extend over your shoulders. This has many advantages. It does not crush your waist and make you feel like you constantly have to pee. It also makes it very difficult to use the restroom as removing the shorts means you need to remove your top, although that’s probably more of a disadvantage now that I think about it. But the biggest advantage of bib shorts is that they do not need that torso crushing waistband. Rather than give you that aforementioned elegant and delightful muffin top, they squish all your midsection squishables into a dignified barrel shape. Given the choice of barrel or muffin, I choose barrel.

 

So there you have it. Cycling shorts are padded yoga pants that squish you into curious and wondrous shapes for the amusement of your spouse and, to a lesser extent, to allow you to ride free from physical pain. This freedom from physical pain allows you to savor the psychological pain that is inseparable from the sport of road cycling.

 

The more you know.


Comments